Serious structural problems were present at the time of this check.
- Liquidity locked
- 100%
- Top 10 hold
- 100%
- Liquidity
- $2,120
What happened next
-
Liquidity went from $27.2K to $2.0K (down 92.5%), holders sold into the pool, the liquidity was not withdrawn.
Measured 3 days after this record was written. This record had already said high risk.
These are measurements taken after the verdict above, not part of it. The verdict and its fingerprint are unchanged: that is the point of recording them separately. Anyone can re-check these figures against the chain.
How to check this record
This page is never re-scanned. The verdict above is what Veriql concluded at that moment and it never changes; anything under "what happened next" was measured later and is kept separate for exactly that reason. The fingerprint below is a SHA-256 of the verdict alone, so you can confirm it was not edited once the outcome was known.
f1899ed331ad5e44f8ab5964de781695f89dcc4419483ba6853d3af646c31d8e
Recompute it from this, verbatim:
["veriql.verdict.v1","solana","BEpRFSjX3uGLVZ47vQGzbu49ersj3LDdrNtfc9vGpump",32,"danger","Martin",[["holderCount",null],["liquidityUsd",2120.49],["lpLockedPercent",100],["top10Percent",99.98]],"2026-10-23T11:35:32.704Z"]
Stored fingerprint matches the stored verdict.
What this is and is not. A record of a check at a point in time. A clean result never meant the token was safe, only that no known risks were found then: contracts get upgraded, ownership changes, and liquidity can leave after a check. We publish these whether they later proved right or wrong, because a track record that keeps only its wins is marketing.