Serious structural problems were present at the time of this check.
- Top 10 hold
- 100%
- Liquidity
- $0
- Holders
- 33
What happened next
-
Liquidity went from $418 to $0 (down 100.0%), the liquidity was withdrawn from the pool.
Measured 1 minutes after this record was written. Our verdict before it said caution.
These are measurements taken after the verdict above, not part of it. The verdict and its fingerprint are unchanged: that is the point of recording them separately. Anyone can re-check these figures against the chain.
How to check this record
This page is never re-scanned. The verdict above is what Veriql concluded at that moment and it never changes; anything under "what happened next" was measured later and is kept separate for exactly that reason. The fingerprint below is a SHA-256 of the verdict alone, so you can confirm it was not edited once the outcome was known.
5e606b9c35cf123707975dcbe9204effc9236485290d0ba19ee32becc4ebfde6
Recompute it from this, verbatim:
["veriql.verdict.v1","solana","DAfNj9Gw8vUaiY8SqnpRohQka6p3vS9T82ex1M7Vpump",39,"danger","奶蛙",[["holderCount",33],["liquidityUsd",0],["lpLockedPercent",null],["top10Percent",99.85000000000002]],"2026-11-10T10:23:08.869Z"]
Stored fingerprint matches the stored verdict.
What this is and is not. A record of a check at a point in time. A clean result never meant the token was safe, only that no known risks were found then: contracts get upgraded, ownership changes, and liquidity can leave after a check. We publish these whether they later proved right or wrong, because a track record that keeps only its wins is marketing.